Case 8 of 12 in queue
Harassment · Reply on a take
In reviewClaimed by youSLA 24 h · 4 h 20 min leftReport rpt_7f3aContent cmt_51d0Author usr_4e7b4 reports · first 19 h 40 min agoPosted 27 Sep, 18:22 BST
Take · Opinion@mira_builds · 27 Sep, 16:05 · 2 sourcesRent Caps Freeze New BuildingWhen returns on rentals are capped, investors put money into other kinds of property. The exemption for new units only helps if people believe it will last.
@oakandiron· 17:40Most versions only cap existing units, so new building isn’t capped directly. Which version is this?
@mira_builds· 17:52This one covers units built before 2019, so you’re right that new builds are exempt. The worry is investors expecting the exemption to end.
@plainfactsTeen· 18:10Is there data on what happened to building permits after caps like this?
Reported@ledgerhawk · 18:22 · replying to @mira_buildsYou again? Everyone on this thread knows you’re a paid shill. Sheep like you will believe any chart a landlord hands you. Rent caps protect tenants, end of story.Edited once, 2 min after postingMatched words underlined
@mira_builds· 18:30Happy to look at evidence that caps protect tenants. What are you basing that on?
@ledgerhawk· 18:34Not wasting my time on you.
@oakandiron· 18:41There’s a fair case for caps: stability for long-term renters. It doesn’t need the name-calling.
Viewpoint check. “Rent caps protect tenants” is an allowed position and stays welcome. Decide on the insults aimed at @mira_builds, not on the argument.
Signals
- Aimed at a person
- Yes · @mira_builds
- Rewrite suggestion
- Shown, ignored
- Insult score
- 0.81 · high
- Spam score
- 0.03 · low
- Replies to this person, 7 d
- 9
2 Jul 26Removed · 3.2 HarassmentNo appeal · Omar Haddad
12 Mar 26Warning · 3.2 HarassmentAppealed, upheld · Lena Park
Strikes in 12 months: 1 of 3 · No active mute
4 reporters
“Third time this week he’s called me a shill instead of answering.” · @mira_builds, the person replied to
“Name-calling instead of arguing.” · @oakandiron
2 others chose Harassment without a note. Reporters are never shown to the author.
Similar past decisions
Matched on category, clause and wordingrpt_61aa · Aug 2026Called another reader a “paid shill” twice in one thread.Remove and warn · 3.2Upheld on appeal
rpt_5e02 · Jul 2026Called an argument “naive and lazy”, no insult to the person.No violation · criticism of an ideaNot appealed
rpt_4b9d · Sep 2026Repeated insults at one person within a month of a warning.Remove and mute 3 days · 3.2Appeal modified to 1 day
You’ve been on the queue for 52 minutes. A break reminder appears at 60.